![]() I have done the same test but on a group bus before the master. This give results that can be listened to but with a lot of noticable dropuots. This is to mimic a typical case when we load a single group or bus with plugins that put a lot of demand on the CPU. I've now added several TDR Limiter 6 to the master bus (heavy stuff, both CPU and sound wise). What happens when we pass audio through a single bus/group? With ASIO Guard High Cubase can scale very well to multiple cores when faced with a load that allows it. When playing back, my computer acts like in the attached pictures. But as we will see, it can teach us some important lessons. It's obviously a contrived setup, no real project is so easily balanced by Cubase. And no, I don't own Acustica stuff, it's incompatible with my workflow. I chose those plugins because they're some of the most demanding I own. 48 Massive X tracks, all burdened with S-Gear and and TDR Kotelnikov GE plugins.But as it's totally focused on audio, I think the results are generalizable and applicable for many.Īnd here's the setup in Cubase for most tests This maybe a bit more powerful than many of the computers in use here. Windows 10 professional, no tweaks other than Ultimate Performance.No other disturbing software (no games and ****.).Computer from Scan audio, setup for DAW use.AMD Ryzen 3900X 12 core CPU, no overclocking.Now comes the meat and potatoes of this thread: how Cubase works. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |